How to Make SharePoint List Column (Form Field) Read Only? – SharePoint Diary.Visio intall error: encountered an error during setup – Microsoft Community

Looking for:

Microsoft visio 2013 encountered an error during setup free

Click here to Download

Any image, link, or discussion of nudity. Follow the steps to enable the Local Administrator on Windows:. If it is different, you should immediately get a warning message that you cannot mix bit versions. Unsolicited bulk mail or bulk advertising. This site in other languages x.


Microsoft visio 2013 encountered an error during setup free

Here is the detailed solution. Here are some screen shots :. The following errors may appear in log file and typically don’t indicate a Setup problem:. Any content of an adult theme or inappropriate to a community web site.


[Microsoft visio 2013 encountered an error during setup free


CompareTo System. Object obj. Equals Method bool Equals System. GetSchema Method System. XmlSchema IXmlSerializable. GetType Method type GetType. ReadXml System. XmlReader reader.

ToByte Method byte ToByte. ToDouble Method double ToDouble. ToInt16 Method int16 ToInt ToInt32 Method int ToInt ToInt64 Method long ToInt ToSingle Method float ToSingle. ToString Method string ToString. WriteXml System. XmlWriter writer. Well, it is obvious that we could use the To… functions to convert the resulting decimal value to some other sub datatypes.

Well, there is one reason in the world of databases that is incompatible to the type system of most other programming or script languages and always requires special treatment: Null values! In most traditional programming languages special functions have been introduced to test for nullable values.

That said, our new query does work for us, but hey, we only received one value where three values should be available: intCount , strCount , and datCount! The solution is rather obvious so we can simply add two statements after the GetOracleDecimal call:. We can query rather complex Oracle result sets now!

What about receiving several rows as result of a query? Of course, we could add this in a one liner by using a constant string, which is not the way I would like to do that! IsKey :. DataType : System.

IsLong : False. Along with a whole bunch of other valuable information about our data columns, we can access the ColumnName property:. If we can retrieve the column names, we may come up with a nice header line after some formatting:. We would prefer to have objects here and let Windows Powershell do all the formatting for us. GetOracleDecimal 0. GetOracleString 1. GetOracleDate 2. Additionally, the filtering and sorting capabilities of a data grid view are now for free. I did exchange the data reader with a data adapter, which has a Fill method that can automatically populate a dataset or data table with the results of the select statement.

This is at least a timesaver writing the script code. A rather interesting question came to mind now: Is it a timesaver regarding performance, too? Well, we probably should do some testing now. But measuring the execution time of the select command is most likely faulty if we just execute one select. Maybe 10 selects would provide a better measurement basis and retrieving more than 10 rows, maybe , might be better, too. To do so, we are getting a bit more Windows Powershell-stylish now and encapsulate the two scripts in functions.

But we should definitely consider some more changes. The new versions of the script might look even better if we parameterize the select statement and probably the connection string, too! Additionally, the use of a constant connection string is not the best solution.

I added rudimentary error checking and a very simple checking on both input parameters, too. We just set the whole function inside a try-catch-finally block to catch and report any errors that are likely to happen during database operations.

I mentioned above that it might be necessary to do some repetitions if you want to measure the execution time of each command to get a feeling for the performance of both procedures, but, in fact, it is rather obvious that the first command lasts longer than the second does. However, measure the time for 10 loops of each command now. Instead of the last two lines, do the following:. And definitely wrong, as I can tell you from my experience!

But I can explain to you that each database relies on heavy, well elaborated, and highly tuned caching algorithms that prevent a reasonable timing if you loop through the same statement.

The statement is preparsed and cached, the previously calculated execution plan is used again and if result set caching is available, the execution may be skipped at all, and the old result set will just be returned to the client. So, we will have to clear the buffer cache and shared pool before we can execute each statement once, if we really would like to have reasonable timing data for at least one execution of each statement.

Days : 0. Hours : 0. Minutes : 0. Seconds : 2. Ticks : TotalDays : 2,E TotalHours : 0, Seconds : 0. TotalDays : 3,E TotalHours : 8,E These data are more realistic! But still the data adapter is ready in 0. Is it real that the data adapter received the results 7 to 8 times faster than the reader? Very unlikely, I would say.

I will flush the database cache each time before I test the statement. We can definitely expect that most of the time if used inside the loop:. It may be that they are slowing the operation down:. Well, this is not too bad at all! It seems to be even faster than the preceding measurement, which is, of course, hardly possible.

It is more or less a result of inaccurate timing for such fast operations. Even if we consume the data, we are still pretty fast getting at the results!

So what else could be the reason why? No remarkable changes, too! No significant change, but the objects were empty! At least partially. We found the slow operation: Adding members to the PsCustomObject seems to be very time consuming. Comparing it to the original 2. This would be an improvement that Windows Powershell offers for free!

It is less coding and less failure and as we have seen here less execution time! Back to the main insight now: Adding members to our object is slowing the function down! The final question is: Do we have alternative ways to build object and are they faster?

Well, we can build objects like this in Windows Powershell:. GetOracleDecimal 0 ;. GetOracleString 1 ;. GetOracleDate 2 ;. This seems to make a difference, too. It is still faster than Add-Member , but slower than the second solution … at least in this case. But wait! There is still another new solution available in Windows Powershell 3.

We have the new [pscustomobject] type accelerator available now:. The last thing I want to do now is to generalize the solution a little further!

We still have used a special query up to now that returns three values in each row with fixed data types: OracleDecimal , OracleString , and OracleDate. This is very special and the question arises if we can modify the solution further to accept other types of data and more or less than three columns per row.

Of course, we can but as a constructor of a [pscustomobject] with variable initial values is not available, can we still profit the fastest solution or will we have to go back to the Add-Member solution, which is very slow? GetSchemaTable , where this information is part of the row description:. But even if we had the type information, we would further have to use this information in a switch statement to retrieve the function call that is appropriate for the current field type. This is not fun!

But wait, there is an easier way out! We can use the type neutral function:. Object GetOracleValue int i. Nicely enough, the field count is a property of the data reader:. This way we can use the fast constructor but have a variable initialization. In fact, we are back to where we started from: We have a time of over 2 seconds again. A little additional overhead would be OK, if we can generalize queries.

But is it really true that we are back to where we started from? I really thought so at first but investigating things further I discovered that the loop construct followed by the pipe is quite slow. This is quite acceptable for a generalized solution! Something to remember! If you are not convinced that it really does what it is supposed to do, we can supply some alternative queries just to present the results. Here is result of a query that returns the Fibonacci numbers and the depth level of the recursion or just a counter if you prefer that.

In easy words: Start with two numbers 0 and 1. You may notice that calculating the last values takes a noticeable amount of time. Just one last remark. There is also an iterative solution available that is by far faster, of course, as shown here:. And I can tell you that this statement runs in nearly no time, too! It is usually available to each user. The results are looking good but maybe you expected that the order of the displayed columns should be different according to the select statement.

If you need to keep the order, you can pipe the result to Select-Object and enumerate the fields in the right order:. Why exactly could the order of the columns not be preserved?

And here is something new in Windows Powershell 3. Adding the [ordered] tag as part of the creation of the hashtable does do the job. So reordering the result by Select-Object is no longer needed. So, we have retrieved three OracleDecimals , two OracleStrings , and one OracleDate here, which is quite close to what you might have guessed. True False DataRow System. And even the types are not identical, though similar:.

It just returns the corresponding. NET types. Back to our original question: Is the data adapter faster than the data reader?

Yes, it looks like that. And that is an observation that is even opposite to some articles I have read before. We had 0, seconds for the data adapter, and now we still have 0, seconds for the data reader, which is small, but in recurring queries and maybe if larger result sets have to returned, significant difference!

If you think: Why should I bother? I will always use the data adapter that returns a ready to use dataset or a data table with less coding in a smaller amount of time? First of all: I am not sure if it may not be possible to tune the data reader further with special database parameters like the fetchsize to make it even faster. The data reader can be used to serially progress each data row, the data adapter has to fetch all the data before you can progress any row.

One other thing to remember is that you have a permanent connection to the database while you use the data reader to fetch each row. You have to manually open and close the connection before you start reading the data and after you finished to do so. This is the path the scheduled task would actually live at so I opened Task Scheduler and drilled down through the path. Since this path was empty, I deleted the Office folder entirely from Task Scheduler and re-ran setup again.

This time it finished successfully! I don’t know why the simple fact that the Office folder existed within Task Scheduler prevented this from running but its removal fixed my issue. Was this reply helpful? Yes No. Sorry this didn’t help. Thanks for your feedback. Choose where you want to search below Search Search the Community. Search the community and support articles Install, redeem, activate Microsoft and Office Search Community member.

Muhammad Shoaib Anjum. This thread is locked. You can follow the question or vote as helpful, but you cannot reply to this thread. I have the same question Report abuse. Details required :. Cancel Submit. In reply to TamoghnaMandal’s post on October 27, I know this is a necro post but I wanted to add to the solution list for anyone else who continues to have this problem, even now in How satisfied are you with this reply?